Chemical recycling vs. enzymatic recycling: which will emerge as the winner? – ChinaTexnet.com
Home >> Textile News >> Chemical recycling vs. enzymatic recycling: which will emerge as the winner?

Chemical recycling vs. enzymatic recycling: which will emerge as the winner?

2026-06-11 10:15:23 CCFGroup

-Chemical recycling of rPET enables true closed-loop recycling (bottle-to-bottle, textile-to-textile).

-BHET route gains dominance due to lower cost and simpler process compared to DMT route.

-Enzymatic technology, though still in pilot stage, is a highly promising direction for PET recycling.

Chemical recycling of recycled PET is advancing from laboratory research to large-scale industrial application driven by the global dual-carbon goals and brand owners' policies for recycled product traceability. Unlike mechanical recycling, which only changes physical forms, chemical recycling adopts the process of depolymerization, purification and repolymerization. It can remove impurities and restore virgin-grade performance, enabling true closed-loop recycling such as "textile-to-textile" and "bottle-to-bottle". Globally, chemical recycling of rPET has entered a critical phase featuring large-scale commercialization, dominance by leading enterprises and diversified technical routes. Among various chemical depolymerization technologies, the DMT (dimethyl terephthalate) route and BHET (bis-hydroxyethyl terephthalate) route are the two mainstream solutions. They differ in process design, product forms, economic efficiency and application adaptability, jointly shaping the technical landscape of the recycled polyester sector.

Comparison items BHET (Ethylene   Glycol Alcoholysis) DMT (BHET   Transesterification Process)
Reaction stages Single-stage   depolymerization Two   stages: alcoholysis + transesterification
Core solvents Ethylene   glycol (single solvent) Mixed   solvents: ethylene glycol + methanol
Direct Polymerization High-purity   BHET can be fed into polymerization reactor directly Further   transesterification to produce BHET is required before polymerization
Impurity treatment Purified   by crystallization; moderate capacity for dye removal Multi-column   distillation + recrystallization; excellent decolorization and impurity   removal performance, suitable for heavily contaminated waste textiles
Capital investment for equipment Low   investment for monomer production; no methanol distillation column required Extra   facilities for methanol distillation and DMT precision distillation, leading   to high equipment investment

Compared with the DMT route, the BHET route eliminates one transesterification step, featuring a shorter production flow, lower costs and energy consumption, as well as lower entry barriers. Therefore, the BHET route is expected to be adopted more widely in new chemical recycling projects in the future.

Currently, some recycled polyester fiber producers procure chemically recycled PET chips priced between 11,000 and 15,600yuan/mt to produce differentiated functional fibers. Some buyers report unsatisfactory application results. Products priced at 15,000-15,600yuan/mt deliver relatively better performance with whiter color, while lower-priced products show mediocre quality and poor color tone. Meanwhile, the CCFGroup 3A-grade white PET flakes is at 6,650yuan/mt, recycled chips at 7,800yuan/mt, and semi-dull virgin PET chips at 7,200yuan/mt. By comparison, chemically recycled chips show poor cost performance. Market purchasing interest remains weak without the T2T (Textile-to-Textile) concept. That said, costs of chemical recycling are gradually declining alongside technological upgrades.

The enzymatic recycling technology uses degrading enzymes as catalysts to depolymerize PET into PTA and MEG monomers under mild conditions (ambient temperature & pressure or moderate temperature). It is now in the pilot test stage and stands out as a highly promising development direction for the recycling industry.

Comparison items Enzymatic   Recycling BHET Chemical   Recycling DMT Chemical   Recycling
Reaction conditions Ambient   temperature & pressure, no high temperature/pressure Moderate   temperature & normal pressure Multi-stage   temperature control, highest energy consumption
Products rPTA   + EG BHET DMT   + EG
Processing cost Relatively   high (pilot phase) Medium Highest
Energy consumption Lowest Medium Highest
Rawmaterial adaptability Capable   of handling complex wastes hard to process by conventional chemical methods;   no need to remove dyes and additives in advance Applicable   to waste PET in various forms including fabrics, films and bottles; certain   requirements on raw material cleanliness Strong   depolymerization and purification capacity for raw materials with high   impurity content such as blended fibers, colored PET and dyed textile wastes
Commercialization maturity Transition   from pilot to mass production (2026-2028) Fully   commercialized, currently in rapid capacity expansion Mature   technology with high investment; cautious on new capacity expansion

In the next few years, BHET route may become the mainstream for new chemical recycling capacity expansion thanks to its low cost and integrated process advantages. DMT route will maintain its differentiated market edge with strong adaptability to mixed waste materials and export premium. The two chemical routes will dominate domestic chemical recycling capacity. Restrained by high costs of enzyme preparations, enzymatic technology stays at the pilot stage yet gains rapid traction in the waste textile recycling segment. In the long run, continuous technological breakthroughs will cut costs for both chemical and enzymatic recycling. This will reshape the cost structure of PET recycling and drive the industry to shift increasingly from mechanical recycling to full closed-loop chemical recycling.

Keywords: